“what we live is what we kill” says Oruç Aruoba in his poem. 

Death is the hardest hard cut: there is life, the other moment there’s no life. it is real but it is also fiction because we’ll never know, we have things we feel about death and after it, logic cannot do anything, poor thing. Death is wrong. It is a mistake. A disaster. A mess. and it’s only a surprise for us what’s next if any. A new unknown zero in a new unknown system.
I think I am imitating death.

They say it will be easier to love an AI (than livings) because they don’t die. Imagine killing an AI, imagine what would their last words be if they knew what death is, imagine AI heaven and AI hell, imagine AI imagining. Imagine I shut up now. I cun’t ,,,,, it is 4 am and I’m rolling down the Mount Ağrı at 1000 km/h.

Quoting Elif Acar “Death is so close that the technology we use disappears according to its next model or the clothes we buy disappear according to the trend of fashion. We need to kill more in order to live more.” 

Not only we are mortal but also ‘what we live’ is mortal in and with us. I write, tweet, share things I can’t bear to kill. So come, you bite me too, you kill me too, you understand me too and let’s end here zero to zero.

“no plots, all twists” tweeted @LeeCram.

The inevitable outcome of (hard cuts) (death) (mistakes) (pop) (randomness) is SURPRISE.

hmmmmmm random? random?? you sure it is random???
we never expect a random thing to happen (especially in NL, omg)

surprise hits when expectations aren’t met,,,truths aren’t proven. Can’t this be a new weapon for pop?

Now that Pop made a strong base of expectations and ways to build them,, we can break them. 
We have enough weapons, let’s now make POP a mess.

Given a formal system rich enough to model number theory, Gödel comes up with a string G of the system whose meaning under interpretation is: 

“G is not provable.”

If G were false, then G would be provable and hence true, a contradiction. So G must be true, making it an unprovable truth.

(https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/wwNnzaPnB5a48K86N/book-review-goedel-escher-bach-an-in-depth-explainer)

This poetic simplification of Gödel’s Incompleteness theorem means that, provability and truth aren’t the same things. (mathematics are human-made and there is more truth than humans’ truth (provabilities)).

And what if we say G is actually false and hence provable,,, it means mathematics is delusional, math is bulshitting. Or means that mathematics can make jokes. So so so so so sexy.